The Other Reality

Mourning and Melancholia

Posted in Annotation, MFA by aryckman on March 18, 2009

Sigmund Freud’s “Mourning and Melancholia” The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud The Hogarth Press: London. Vol. 14, pg 239-260.

In his essay, “Mourning and Melancholia”, Sigmund Freud sets out to clarify the difference between mourning and melancholia. Although these states are often triggered by the same circumstances he discusses what conditions need to be present for the two states to progress along their varying paths. While some statements are based on observations much of his writing on melancholia is conjectured, and Freud continues to remind the reader of this by asking questions of his own theories throughout the essay.
“Mourning is regularly the reaction to the loss of a loved person, or to the loss of some abstraction which had taken the place of one, such as one’s country, liberty, an ideal, and so on” (243). Mourning is not associated with pathological issues because it is a normal reaction to events and generally is overcome with time. During the mourning period the person realizes that the loved person or object that is lost is truly gone and turns away from reality. This turning away from reality is marked by dejection, loss of interest, inability to love and inhibition of all activities. These same symptoms are present in melancholia, however, in mourning reality eventually wins out and slowly the person returns to their normal state.
Mourning is a conscious response to something, a specific death, whereas melancholia is often unconscious, resulting from a loss that cannot be physically perceived, like love. Melancholia is more puzzling because of this absence of a loss that can be observed. Also in melancholia exists the additional symptom of a lowering of self-regard. “In mourning it is the world which has become poor and empty; in melancholia it is the ego itself” (246). The person believes that they are inferior and despicable and have always been that way and will tell others about their inferiority. The fact that they feel comfortable enough to tell people how awful they are is unusual because most people who are ashamed or feel remorse for something do not feel comfortable in sharing that.
Freud follows this with observing that the characteristics that a patient suffering from melancholia will chastise themselves for having do not actually apply to them but will often be characteristics of a person they are close to. Because they are actually debasing someone or something else they do not have a problem with sharing those criticisms even though they apply it to themselves.
Freud describes the internal work of mourning:
… each single one of the memories and situations of expectancy which demonstrates the libido’s attachment to the lost object is met by the verdict of reality that the object no longer exists; and the ego, confronted as it were with the question whether it shall share this fate, is persuaded by the sum of the narcissistic satisfactions it derives from being alive to sever its attachment to the object that has been abolished (255).
Slowly the libido withdraws from the lost object and finds a new one to replace it with.  In melancholia, however, the libido withdraws into the ego and identifies itself with the lost object. This would make sense in ambivalent relationships where the love/hate relation to the object simultaneously wills it to stay and leave at the same time. This identification with the object can become dangerous when the melancholic desires the object to disappear enough to harm him or herself.
With time melancholia can also pass as it does in mourning alternatively melancholia may also shift towards mania. Freud questions why this is more prone to happen in melancholia than mourning. His initial reasoning is that in mourning the libido’s disassociation with the object is so gradual that there is never a large about of cathetic energy being displaced. Whereas in melancholia when the ego finally has overpowered the object that it has identified with all of its cathectic energies that had been entangled are free and this sudden release throws the individual into mania.
Freud reminds his audience that “the interdependence of the complicated problems of the mind forces us to break off every enquiry before it is completed—till the outcome of some other enquiry can come to its assistance” (285). With mourning being such an integral part of human life it is much easier to attempt to explain how the mind adapts to a sudden change such as death. When the mind takes similar events and alters that process it becomes more difficult to explain and therefore, until other aspects of the mind have been made clear, we are left only with hypotheses.

About these ads

6 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. [...] rest can be read here Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post. This entry was posted in 352MC Professional [...]

  2. fariba said, on April 2, 2012 at 5:37 pm

    i love to read the rest of it

  3. Melancholia | John Pistelli said, on April 26, 2013 at 7:39 pm

    [...] But it’s really not so clear, is it?  Von Trier knows his Freud well enough to know that melancholia means an ego-wasting inability to let go of the lost object, which in this case is life itself.  The melancholic is emphatically not a Buddhist or Stoic or monastic, one who has superseded her own attachment to the world;  instead, the melancholic actually loves the world more than those who are successfully able to mourn, to bury the dead, to get married, to go to work, to efface themselves in the name of perpetuating things.  The melancholic doesn’t discipline herself to turn away from the world; she remains in the world and brings it down by the force of her own abjection.  A Freud explicator explains it this way: [...]

  4. joseph ferrara said, on January 5, 2014 at 7:18 am

    There’s another connection and that is the idea of retrospectively educating oneself within the process of mourning. What has that person, or whatever loss we are mourning, meant to us. How has the object of mourning brightened or informed our lives. Freud linked successful mourning to progress of a psychoanalytic nature. A student of his Wilhelm Stekel in Technique of Psychoanalysis (1939) linked the “analytic experience” to the overcoming of “scotoma” or psychic blind spot, a “stream of reminiscenses” and a “lightning flash of illumination.” So insights may be linked to the process of mourning.

  5. sordidday said, on May 9, 2014 at 9:34 am

    Reblogged this on sordidday.

  6. len sive said, on October 22, 2014 at 5:18 pm

    Mourning seems to me to tie the mourner and the mourned togehter inextricably–which is precisely the problem: the mourned enters into the psyche of the mourner. One can no longer live a life within oneself, but one has embraced the mourned, wedded one’s self to it, and thus disenabled one’s self to grow, to deepen, to find new sources of life and love and happiness. All is bound up in the mourned. The mourner and the mourned become one; the only way out, believes the mourner, is to die. That will stop the pain, so he feels, and it will also ensure that the mourner and mourned are tied together (so he believes) for all eternity.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: